Paper online: The Role of Surface Structure in Normal Contact Stiffness (Experimental Mechanics)

C. Zhai , Y. Gan, D. Hanaor, G. Proust, D. Retraint. The Role of Surface Structure in Normal Contact Stiffness. Experimental Mechanics. In press.

[DOI:10.1007/s11340-015-0107-0]

Link: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11340-015-0107-0/fulltext.html

Abstract: The effects of roughness and fractality on the normal contact stiffness of rough surfaces were investigated by considering samples of isotropically roughened aluminium. Surface features of samples were altered by polishing and by five surface mechanical treatments using different sized particles. Surface topology was characterised by interferometry-based profilometry and electron microscopy. Subsequently, the normal contact stiffness was evaluated through flat-tipped diamond nanoindentation tests employing the partial unloading method to isolate elastic deformation. Three indenter tips of various sizes were utilised in order to gain results across a wide range of stress levels. We focus on establishing relationships between interfacial stiffness and roughness descriptors, combined with the effects of the fractal dimension of surfaces over various length scales. The experimental results show that the observed contact stiffness is a power-law function of the normal force with the exponent of this relationship closely correlated to surfaces’ values of fractal dimension, yielding corresponding correlation coefficients above 90 %. A relatively weak correlation coefficient of 60 % was found between the exponent and surfaces’ RMS roughness values. The RMS roughness mainly contributes to the magnitude of the contact stiffness, when surfaces have similar fractal structures at a given loading, with a correlation coefficient of −95 %. These findings from this work can be served as the experimental basis for modelling contact stiffness on various rough surfaces.

Keywords: Contact mechanics Contact stiffness Rough surfaces Fractal dimension Nanoindentation

EM_1507.06549v1

Figure: The calculated sample surface areas at different scales. The insets show the digitised scans used to calculate the surface area for the samples that underwent sand blasting using 50 μm-sized glass beads.

This entry was posted in Publications and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*
*